The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Discussion of playback questions / problems. Any recording where people have playback problems should appear here.

Moderator: Chad

Post Reply
PP.
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:53 pm
Location: Greece

The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by PP. » Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:27 am

There is a playback issue with this rom(jleague) which I've detected from last May,
playback shows normally only first match, then goes crazy.
Phil has uploaded an inp with scores in second and third game, but you won't see them.
So, shoud we add a special rule about only first match?

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by Phil Lamat » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:27 am

No special rule because playback doesn't work.
We just have to wait till playback problems will be fixed for this game

PP.
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:53 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by PP. » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:21 am

Phil Lamat wrote:No special rule because playback doesn't work.
We just have to wait till playback problems will be fixed for this game
And meanwhile we'll have scores which do not agree with playback?
I guess you have to edit your score to 105, as I did too. Otherwise anyone can claim any score.

User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4116
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by mahlemiut » Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:28 pm

PP. wrote:
Phil Lamat wrote:No special rule because playback doesn't work.
We just have to wait till playback problems will be fixed for this game
And meanwhile we'll have scores which do not agree with playback?
I guess you have to edit your score to 105, as I did too. Otherwise anyone can claim any score.
Or have it zeroed because no one can play it back. Need to start maintaining a list of games with problematic playback again, it's just really hard to keep updated.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by Phil Lamat » Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:42 pm

Score adjusted. I've made several tests (no sound, constant frameskipping etc) but game still desyncs on second match.
Parent (svf) was ok with older versions. Some stuff for Mame dev

PP.
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:53 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by PP. » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:21 pm

What about "jleagueo", is it a diffrent game? You inp says "jleague".
And what about "dsaber", after so many months vaz's score of 32040 still remains there.

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by Phil Lamat » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:41 pm

What was jleague under 0.106 became what is jleagueo now.

PP.
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:53 pm
Location: Greece

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by PP. » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:02 pm

Phil Lamat wrote:What was jleague under 0.106 became what is jleagueo now.
Maybe this should be written in special rules?

So, if I play "jleague" in under 0.106, it will be "jleagueo"?
Playback is normal?

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Re: The J.League 1994 (Japan, Rev A)

Post by Phil Lamat » Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:18 am

PP. wrote: Maybe this should be written in special rules?
Done (for jleague)
PP. wrote: So, if I play "jleague" in under 0.106, it will be "jleagueo"?
Yes, if you play jleague with 0.106, you will have to submit under "jleagueo" on Marp.
A classic problem, can be avoided now when reading special rules for Jleague.
All mame renames bring a bit of confusion as usual
PP. wrote: Playback is normal?
I guess ; my 0.106 inp seems to playback perfectly.
I suppose something has changed between 0.106 & 0.174 which brings the desync

Post Reply