LIST: Alphamame Blocked Recordings

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

I would gain a few spots if ranking is by the 10-3-1 system. :P

However, wouldn't this discourage many players that won't bother even submitting a score if it's not in the top 3? ..although I guess in most cases you likely would only be interested in watching the top couple.

I think it puts too much weight on 1st place though. If you have the top 3 scores all within a few percent of each other then the 1st place person doesn't deserve 3.3 times the credit of the 2nd place person and 10 times the credit of the 3rd place person just because they scored a wee bit more.

I like the LB points system.

...but perhaps you want a lower one cuz the version of mame used or platform used.

If you had alphamame for older versions of the mame code base and on all platforms then MARP could become 100% alphamame...only allowing that in new submissions. It could keep the older ones prior to 3/3/03...but remove all regular mame scores posted after that.

However, that day isn't here yet so oh well.
wuzel
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 9:42 am
Location: Poland - Lodz
Contact:

Post by wuzel »

shouldnt this be blocked?? or maybe alphamame rule no longer is being respected


http://marp.retrogames.com/inp/3/0/3/ze ... _win72.zip
It's good 2 be here with U guys :)
Buttermaker
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 788
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 9:06 am

Post by Buttermaker »

8O AlphaMAME blocking stopped almost three months ago.
Novice
The greatest info supplyer
Posts: 532
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:28 am
Location: earth
Contact:

Post by Novice »

DEFCON=4
Buttermaker wrote:8O AlphaMAME blocking stopped almost three months ago.
If so, all "blocked" score must be corrected.
DEFence CONdition
WAR 1<< >>7 PEACE
User avatar
Weehawk
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2558
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:43 am
Location: Devil's Canyon
Contact:

Post by Weehawk »

Novice wrote:If so, all "blocked" score must be corrected.
Alphamame blocking was in effect from March 3, 2003:

viewtopic.php?t=10185&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

until June 27, 2003:

viewtopic.php?t=10539&start=0

Any scores that were "blocked" during this period are correct (blocked).

No change at this point would be appropriate.
John Cunningham (JTC)
Image
User avatar
LordGaz
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 5:07 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by LordGaz »

I disagree, all blocked scores should be unblocked as though alphamame never existed in the first place. Who's to say no one had a copy of a mame-alphamame inp 'converter' during this time which is the reason why the alphamame project was dropped.

Gaz.
Buttermaker
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 788
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 9:06 am

Post by Buttermaker »

LordGaz wrote:Who's to say no one had a copy of a mame-alphamame inp 'converter' during this time which is the reason why the alphamame project was dropped.
That's not the point. The people using standard MAME could've just used AlphaMAME.
User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4187
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by mahlemiut »

LordGaz wrote:I disagree, all blocked scores should be unblocked as though alphamame never existed in the first place. Who's to say no one had a copy of a mame-alphamame inp 'converter' during this time which is the reason why the alphamame project was dropped.
No converter existed during the blocking period.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image
User avatar
Francois Daniel
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 625
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 8:11 am

Post by Francois Daniel »

Novice wrote:DEFCON=4
Buttermaker wrote:8O AlphaMAME blocking stopped almost three months ago.
If so, all "blocked" score must be corrected.
I agreed with you. It's fair to correct blocked scores if this rule no more exist.

Francois
User avatar
tar
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 9:25 am
Location: ohio u.s.a.

Post by tar »

Too much work to change. I vote to leave well enough alone.
Some recordings were missed during that time period.
Delete certain old scores and/or record and submit over.
LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

It's easy to see both sides of this.

However, I tend to lean toward...

During that time that was a rule at MARP. It was posted very clearly on the main page and the forums and even then if you checked your scores later after uploading them, if they were blocked the editor always posted why etc. All blocked could have easily then just played using alphamame.

They made the choice not to...so why shouldn't that suffer the consequences of the rule that was in effect then?

Those players are still welcome to submit new scores even now using regular mame that won't be blocked that will replace their blocked scores.
infacc00
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 10:26 am
Location: Spain

Post by infacc00 »

But what happens if they resubmit the same inp?

It won't be blocked now, would it?
LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

interesting question there infacc....I'm guessing it wouldn't be. hehe

I agree that it would be a lot of work for editors to reverse these themselves. It was a big enough pain for the editors to block them to start with.

It seems it's in the control of the gamers. If they want their score unblocked it seems just perhaps resubmitting would unblock their score and take care of it.

However, if those scores were already confirmed then on resubmitting they won't show as confirmed so would need to be reconfirmed.
Post Reply