basketball

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Post Reply
User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

basketball

Post by Phil Lamat » Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:55 pm

I've tried a new scoring on a basketball game (pc_dbldr) which takes care of best attack but also good defense ; I would like to know what marpers think of it and if we may apply this to all basket games (like we already did on soccer games)

The pc_dbldr also takes care of level's opponent, but this not the case for most of others basketball games

This is to reward for example a 50-20 against a 50-40, or a 70-60 against a 50-40

I think it's good, but the only doubt I have concerns inputs showing a defeat : shall we count 0 or shall we give a few points ?

User avatar
gameboy9
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 683
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:31 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Post by gameboy9 » Mon Mar 18, 2002 9:30 am

I moved it here - it really does belong here instead of general...

We should probably do offence - defence with the exception of Konami's arcade double dribble, which keeps playing until you lose when your time allotment ends...

In the PC version, we should multiply by the level you played in. So 50-40 on level 3 = 30. Bonus for playing on harder difficulty... you know?
Gameboy9 - Founder and coordinator of MARP Time Trials and Olympiad
Founder - Home Action Replay Page - http://www.homeactionreplay.org
http://gameboy9.marpirc.net

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Mon Mar 18, 2002 11:26 am

yes I had thought about the easiest "points for minus points against", but it is partially satisfying ; because with that (for a same difficulty) a 70-60 is the same than a 50-40 ; and in basket I think we should reward attack first, then pts difference

User avatar
gameboy9
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 683
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:31 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Contact:

Post by gameboy9 » Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:08 pm

oh so you're saying 70-60 = 80 pts on lv 1, 50-40 = 60 pts on lv 1, and 50-40 = 180 pts on lv 3?

I'll buy that!

That should reduce the negative instances...
Gameboy9 - Founder and coordinator of MARP Time Trials and Olympiad
Founder - Home Action Replay Page - http://www.homeactionreplay.org
http://gameboy9.marpirc.net

MDenham
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 2:56 am

Post by MDenham » Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:43 pm

So is the scoring system:

((your score * 2) - (opponent's score)) * (difficulty level)

or should it be more like:

((your score) * (difficulty level + 1) - (opponent's score))

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 1988
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Tue Mar 19, 2002 12:01 pm

No Matt ...
Scoring I'm proposing is :
(1000 for a win)x level + (points for)x10 - (points against)

Let's take your examples :
70-60 level1 = 1000 + 700 - 60 = 1640
50-40 level1 = 1000 + 500 - 40 = 1460
50-40 level3 = 3000 + 500 - 40 = 3460

So that the main thing is to win against highest level

Post Reply