POLL : use of secure version

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Shall we force use of a secure version in certain circumstances (to definite later) ?

Poll ended at Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:55 am

yes
17
68%
no
8
32%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4191
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by mahlemiut »

It would probably be a lot easier to manage if leaderboard points simply weren't awarded for "non-secure" inps. It would also be a lot easier to undo if this decision is reversed at a later date. I'm sure it would a simple code change that Zwaxy could implement in no time.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image
User avatar
destructor
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1972
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 9:38 am
Location: Poland

Post by destructor »

When somebody will see non secure replay on first position can tell -> MARPers are cheaters.
User avatar
Zhorik
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 788
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:16 pm

Post by Zhorik »

mahlemiut wrote:It would probably be a lot easier to manage if leaderboard points simply weren't awarded for "non-secure" inps. It would also be a lot easier to undo if this decision is reversed at a later date. I'm sure it would a simple code change that Zwaxy could implement in no time.
Is anything that ends up getting decided on this going to require a code change by Zwaxy? Has anybody touched base with him to let him know this is likely coming and make sure he's willing to touch the code this way?
User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4191
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by mahlemiut »

Zeroing inps won't require a code change, but it does require an editor to actually do it, and restoring it afterwards, especially if a player uploaded on the game numerous times, may not be so easy.

Personally, I'd prefer something a bit more automatic.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image
Post Reply