trally scoring

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Post Reply
User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

trally scoring

Post by Phil Lamat » Sat Feb 26, 2005 1:04 pm

I propose a time basis scoring for this one :
each race completed = 100000 - time in centiseconds

For example :
Hookman would have 500000-7035-7420-6531-7604-9547 = 461863

Massimo (if inp works for one of you) would have 600000 - his times

Opinions ?

User avatar
The TJT
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2473
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 10:56 am
Location: 20 Grand Palace

Post by The TJT » Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:36 pm

So scoring for game would be:

(number of races completed *100 000) - (time in seconds * 100)

Sounds ok to me. Others?

User avatar
The TJT
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2473
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 10:56 am
Location: 20 Grand Palace

Post by The TJT » Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:17 pm

No need to think this for eternity, no reason to reject this scoring...

So I think it's safe for you Phil to edit special rules for the game.
...And while you are a at it, why not make rules also for...
http://marp.retrogames.com/index.cgi?mo ... radr,radu)
(or is right link: http://marp.retrogames.com/index.cgi?mo ... ,radru-c4)

viewtopic.php?t=12035

OK? :)

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:56 am

Ok ; you will have to patient till next monday, I'm away from home with twins for 3 or 4 days.
But I will update special rules and playback/edit all inputs then

By the way, Massimo's trally input ? need a third to zero, or someone can play it back ?

User avatar
The TJT
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2473
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 10:56 am
Location: 20 Grand Palace

Post by The TJT » Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:41 pm

Sorry can't help with playback...don't have win53. (tried with 55, no success).

Anyways, TIA a bunch...and have a relaxing weekend :)

User avatar
destructor
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 9:38 am
Location: Poland

Post by destructor » Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:40 pm

The TJT wrote:don't have win53
http://mame.joymonkey.com/mame32/

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:23 am

Ouf !! Lot of work (many inputs) but it's done.
Special rules for trally (and trally-a) edited, all inputs playbacked and scores adjusted to new rules (all inputs except Abbe's ; see playbackability section ... anyone lucky with this one ?)

Note that several inputs were made using nvram, some made before the nvram rule was instaured, others (like the first place) after ; I will let Tommi decide what to do on these ones.
I will put this game tomorrow in WCC, so maybe we can let 1 week to Massimo for improvment ; and if he doesn't then zero ?

User avatar
The TJT
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2473
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 10:56 am
Location: 20 Grand Palace

Post by The TJT » Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:40 pm

Phil Lamat wrote:Ouf !! Lot of work (many inputs) but it's done.
Special rules for trally (and trally-a) edited, all inputs playbacked and scores adjusted to new rules
Job well done Philippe :D
Would it be propriate to ask editing similar special rules for radr+radru that I mentioned above? :oops:
Note that several inputs were made using nvram, some made before the nvram rule was instaured, others (like the first place) after ; I will let Tommi decide what to do on these ones.
I will put this game tomorrow in WCC, so maybe we can let 1 week to Massimo for improvment ; and if he doesn't then zero ?


Since trally inps can be recorded without nvram... you are free to zero recordings with nvram, at will, submitted at 2002 or later.

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:09 pm

The TJT wrote:Would it be propriate to ask editing similar special rules for radr+radru
Done

User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat » Sat Apr 23, 2005 3:37 pm

The TJT wrote:Since trally inps can be recorded without nvram... you are free to zero recordings with nvram, at will, submitted at 2002 or later.
Only Massimo was concerned ; inp zeroed (his previous inp playbacks without nvram)

Post Reply