Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm
by Barry Rodewald
Oh yay!
<p>
Latest version, no point in missing out on half the games in MAME now.
<p>
Mervel vs. Capcom in KoA3 plz!
--
bsr@hnpl.net
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm
by Barry Rodewald
And obviously I can't spell. :/
<p>
This board needs an 'edit post' function.
--
bsr@hnpl.net
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2002 12:30 pm
by BBH
TGMAME. Since not all of us have computers that run the newer versions
of MAME all that well.
<p>
-BBH
--
lordbbh@aol.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by QRS
TG mame
<p>
QRS
--
qrs@telia.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Stig Remnes
Once again.
<p>
LATEST MAME !
<p>
THOUGH IF YOU COUNT THE LATEST NANE(56) VOTE, LATEST MAME SHOULD BEEN
CHOSEN.
<p>
Stig
--
sremnes@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by J.D. Lowe
True, Stig, but alas, he didn't vote for latest MAME; he specifically
stated so:
<p>
"I vote for, not the latest version, but .56 "
<p>
I might as well finally vote myself; I vote for TG MAME.
<p>
- J.D. Lowe Knockout Chair
--
jedidrunkenllama@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by phil
35tg for the moment
<p>
but I'm still dreaming for a more recent tg version ; who can do
that ? mark, benjos ? please ... there is a lot of games we all would
like to play in future tourneys, not only m35 games ...
<p>
phil
--
plamat@club-internet.fr
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Joe Ledesma
Maybe, if possible, it would be possible to compile a special mame for
the KOA3? That way, it's speedy for the slower computer users, but we
still get to play any game currently supported by MAME. Just a
thought, maybe someone (myself even?) would be willing to do so, or
even as a group thing.
--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Chris Parsley
Scratches head, I do have a later TG Mame edition than 35 final....
<p>
It was made/compiled as of 37b9...
--
cparsley1@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by J.D. Lowe
I hate to be redundant, but to point out above:
<p>
"I've been advised in the past not to use m37b9tg due to issues out
of my control (that's why back in Deca2001, we had to revert back to
m35tg3b); so this version is not allowed during KoA3."
<p>
- J.D. Lowe Knockout Chair
--
jedidrunkenllama@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by LordGaz
Latest MAME, it works better for and fast enough for me on this
333Mhz machine and the display is crisp. Just have to fiddle about
with some of the advanced settings a bit, ticking the stretching
option actually brings some games up to 100% speed. Win36 had
crackly sound too.
--
garyjlee@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Stig Remnes
Joey, intresting suggestion.
How will you make it faster ?
<p>
Stig
--
sremnes@hotmail.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Joe Ledesma
By re-compiling it with only the selected games and corresponding
drivers, and changing the source code to reflect, I believe it should
run faster. I'm not 100% sure, but the more games/drivers/code added
to MAME makes it run slower, and by removing the unnecessaries for the
tourney would make it run faster. That is my theory, it is possible
that I could be wrong.
--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Barry Rodewald
The number of game drivers aren't what slow down MAME, other than
maybe making the executable ever so slightly larger, requiring more
RAM (the MAME exe is 12MB as it is), but on straight CPU power, it
doesn't.
--
bsr@hnpl.net
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2002 12:30 pm
by Joe Ledesma
What does make MAME slower then? And would recompiling a much smaller
version of MAME make it run faster?
--
JoeyL21988@yahoo.com