Playchoice Vote Over

Gameboy9 · Post by **Gameboy9** » Wed Nov 15, 2000 12:30 pm

The time period for the determination of settings for the PlayChoice-10 Games are over. 48 hours passed after the last vote.


There were three votes which I assumed for the appropriate vote.



There was one vote that I couldn't determine, Steve Krogman's vote. So I asked a neutral person, Ben Jos Walbeehm, who did not vote here, of his opinion. He said since he was talking about continues and such, he suggested the vote be thrown out.



Therefore, based on this unbiased opinion, I must throw out the vote.



Final vote is:



The unlimiteds are seven.



The defaults are six.



The unlimiteds have it, and the DIP Settings for the playchoice games shall be permitted at 3,900 seconds at 1/4 unit / second, or 1 unit / 4 seconds. However, I'm still open to splitting it between unlimited and default. GB9

--
goldengameboy@yahoo.com

Game Guru · Post by **Game Guru** » Thu Nov 16, 2000 12:30 pm

COOL!!!!!!!!!!, nuff said!!


GG

--
gameguru@cableinet.co.uk

QRS · Post by **QRS** » Thu Nov 16, 2000 12:30 pm

Splitting games like smb,smb3,castlevania etc is ok for me.
I like the option to finish games, but a time challange like in smb
is also fun:)



Regards



QRS

--
qrs@telia.com

Chris Parsley · Post by **Chris Parsley** » Fri Nov 17, 2000 12:30 pm

ummm, gameboy, I voted for normal 300ticks, normal time, but it
doesn't appear here. If u are not counting that, then the vote is
tied.

--
cparsley1@hotmail.com

Gameboy9 · Post by **Gameboy9** » Fri Nov 17, 2000 12:30 pm

Where did you vote? You didn't vote on the right thread, and further
more, I'm thinking you JUST voted for default, so I can't count it
because it was after the deadline of 48 hours after the last vote.



Until I know further evidence, and yes I'm welcome to hear further
evidence, I must keep the result of 7 - 6. GB9

--
goldengameboy@yahoo.com

Lagavulin · Post by **Lagavulin** » Fri Nov 17, 2000 12:30 pm

Maybe we should recount ? I suggest a hand recount much more accurate
than an automatic one ... And don't forget the overseas ballots,
Gameboy ...

--
darre@cybercable.fr

Chris Parsley · Post by **Chris Parsley** » Fri Nov 17, 2000 12:30 pm

I received an email to vote on this issue. If I remember right, gb it
was from QT. Voted in that fashion

--
cparsley1@hotmail.com

Gameboy9 · Post by **Gameboy9** » Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:30 pm

You didn't answer my question Chris. Where on the message board did
you vote?



Still welcome to your answer. GB9

--
goldengameboy@yahoo.com

Chad · Post by **Chad** » Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:30 pm

it looks like he voted to QT as an email, an absentee message board
ballet

--
churritz@cts.com

Q.T.Quazar · Post by **Q.T.Quazar** » Sat Nov 18, 2000 12:30 pm

I sent out an e-mail to about 10 MARPers who I knew were active, but
didn't receive anything back from them, aside from Crash, who posted
to the board. I'm willing to believe Chris might have sent it to the
wrong address, but that doesn't really matter. The PC_10 vote wasn't
as decisive as I had hoped, and turnout on it was pretty damn pathetic
considering the total amount of MARPers we have active right now.



I'll ask MARPers to continue submitting under 300 for the next week or
so, while this is sorted out. I'm liking Zwaxy's idea of wswitching
boards to one with a polling set-up a lot more, hwere we won't have
these wild 9-different idea votes that then have to be recategorized.



Q.T.Quazar,
MARP Rules Coordinator

--
qan@home.com