TGMAME + lowest of the low?
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2000 12:30 pm
Hi,
Following the recent thread about TGMAME and it`s legality, not to mention an ' OJ Simpson-type character ' , I now quote a response from MR. Dan Boris, who is a MAME DEV guy , and I presume a close associate of Nicola......here goes..
<p>
"I don't think Nicola reads this board much (if at all) so I will put in my $.02 worth. In my personal opinion the message on the MARP message doesn't sound like something Nicola would write at all. If anything it's to wordy, Nicola is usually straight and to the point.
<p>
As to whether tgmame following, it does technically violate the
it's purpose is to encrypt the INP files it would defeat this purpose if the source was released, so I can understand why it wasn't.
<p>
It doesn't disable any features that the licence forbids disabling, and I don't see a problem with the version numbering."
<p>
Dan
<p>
So MARP`ers , it`s safe to assume Nicola was not responsible for the original thread. Where does that leave us ? The
'alledged ' party is a TG judge? I thought these guys were on-the-level ?
To any TG judge reading this....reconsider. The actual act of impersonating someone else ( for presumably their own benefit or whatever) is definately not in the spirt or ehthics of Twin Galaxies,
or indeed MARP, or anywhere else you care to mention.
<p>
Thats my bit of detective work.
Can we have ( from other sleuths )) a %100 verdict on the 'suspect'?
<p>
Thanks,
ALEX
--
alexeir@indigo.ie
Following the recent thread about TGMAME and it`s legality, not to mention an ' OJ Simpson-type character ' , I now quote a response from MR. Dan Boris, who is a MAME DEV guy , and I presume a close associate of Nicola......here goes..
<p>
"I don't think Nicola reads this board much (if at all) so I will put in my $.02 worth. In my personal opinion the message on the MARP message doesn't sound like something Nicola would write at all. If anything it's to wordy, Nicola is usually straight and to the point.
<p>
As to whether tgmame following, it does technically violate the
it's purpose is to encrypt the INP files it would defeat this purpose if the source was released, so I can understand why it wasn't.
<p>
It doesn't disable any features that the licence forbids disabling, and I don't see a problem with the version numbering."
<p>
Dan
<p>
So MARP`ers , it`s safe to assume Nicola was not responsible for the original thread. Where does that leave us ? The
'alledged ' party is a TG judge? I thought these guys were on-the-level ?
To any TG judge reading this....reconsider. The actual act of impersonating someone else ( for presumably their own benefit or whatever) is definately not in the spirt or ehthics of Twin Galaxies,
or indeed MARP, or anywhere else you care to mention.
<p>
Thats my bit of detective work.
Can we have ( from other sleuths )) a %100 verdict on the 'suspect'?
<p>
Thanks,
ALEX
--
alexeir@indigo.ie